MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403831270 · doi:10.1681/asn.202468e9w2gc

Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Prescriptions in Living Kidney Donors

2024· article· en· W4403831270 on OpenAlexaffabout
Robert R. Quinn, Pietro Ravani, Krista L. Lentine, Rachel Jeong, Ngan N. Lam

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonsteroidalMedicineDrugMedical prescriptionAnti-inflammatoryKidney diseasePharmacologyKidneyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Current guidelines recommend that living kidney donors should avoid non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) due to their potential nephrotoxic effects. It is unclear if physicians are adhering to this guideline recommendation. Methods: We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study of adult living kidney donors in Alberta, Canada, who donated between 2002 and 2019. We identified the proportion of living kidney donors who filled an NSAID prescription at least 1-year beyond date of donation. Of those donors who were prescribed an NSAID, we assessed how many underwent post-prescription laboratory testing for kidney function and potassium within 14 days. Results: Of 759 living kidney donors in the study cohort, 273 (36%) had at least one NSAID prescription over a median follow up of 7.2 years (IQR 3.5-11.5).Donors with at least one NSAID prescription were more likely to be from lower socio-economic status, have an earlier donation date, have higher pre-donation eGFR, and have co-morbid gout and osteoarthritis at the index date. The proportion of donors with at least one prescription in follow-up remained stable over time (~10% per year).Family physicians accounted for 66% of all NSAID prescriptions. Of the donors with an NSAID prescription, 30% also filled at least one prescription for an opioid. Approximately, 10% of donors had measurements of serum creatinine or potassium within 14 days of the first NSAID prescription. The risk of acute kidney injury or hyperkalemia was uncommon in those that underwent laboratory testing (6% and 3% respectively). Conclusion: Over one-third of living kidney donors are prescribed NSAIDs despite current guideline recommendations. Few donors had evidence of post-prescription laboratory testing, but adverse outcomes were uncommon in those who were tested. Further research assessing outcomes following NSAID use is recommended to better inform guidelines for living kidney donors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesFrench-language works237,207