MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403832288 · doi:10.1681/asn.202473whkbzj

Characterization of Screening Patterns and Identification of Patients with Lupus Nephritis in a Community Rheumatology Setting

2024· article· en· W4403832288 on OpenAlexaff
N. Soloman, Jawad Bilal, Romy J. Cabacungan, Scott Milligan, Andrew Sharobeem, John Tesser, Henry Leher

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsAurinia (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLupus nephritisRheumatologyMedicineInternal medicineIdentification (biology)Systemic lupus erythematosusNephrologyDermatologyDiseaseBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a serious but common complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) characterized by proteinuria and decreased renal function. As delays in LN diagnosis may lead to nephron loss and delayed administration of disease-modifying therapies, current treatment recommendations suggest regular screening of patients with SLE for kidney involvement. Given the importance of early identification and treatment of LN, we assessed screening patterns for kidney involvement in patients with SLE in care of community rheumatologists in the United States. Methods: Patient selection criteria: ≥2 diagnosis codes for SLE separated by >30 days, in care of the American Rheumatology Network (ARN) between July 2018 and June 2023, and >365 days observation. Individual patient observation windows were calculated from the first date of observation by ARN (index date) to the last encounter date, up to June 30, 2023. Patients were suspected of having probable LN if they had any of the following qualifying events during their observation window: an ICD-10 code for LN, an ICD-10 code suggestive of LN (e.g., kidney issues or related testing), or laboratory results indicative of proteinuria or reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR >20% less than observed at earliest observation and where lower eGFR measure is <72 mL/min/1.73 m2 and not already categorized by ICD-10 code). Results: 8631 of >540,000 patients with data in the ARN database met all study criteria. Of these, 5314 (62%) had at least one qualifying event during their observation window; 24% of patients had a diagnosis of LN by ICD-10 code, whereas an additional 38% had laboratory values or other ICD-10 coding suggestive of LN. Of the 62% of patients with probable LN, 97% had record of an eGFR assessment compared to 66% and 62% of patients, respectively, who had record of protein assessment by urine test strip or urine protein. Conclusion: This study suggests that most patients with SLE will develop renal involvement over the course of their disease. These data support increased routine screening of SLE patients for LN via regular utilization of urine protein testing, consistent with the LN treatment guidelines. Funding: Commercial Support - Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→