MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403833131 · doi:10.1681/asn.2024dxjcff1n

Association between AKI during Cisplatin Therapy in Children with CKD and Hypertension at 12 and 36 Months after Therapy End

2024· article· en· W4403833131 on OpenAlexaff
Sharaniza Ab‐Rahim, Asaf Lebel, Kelly R. McMahon, Vedran Cockovski, Stella Wang, Jasmine Lee, Michael Zappitelli, Able Study Group

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicElectrolyte and hormonal disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCisplatinAssociation (psychology)Internal medicineChemotherapyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cisplatin (CisP) may cause acute kidney injury (AKI) in children treated for cancer. Predicting post-CisP chronic kidney disease (CKD) or elevated blood pressure or hypertension (≥eBP) remains elusive. We determined: 1) adjusted associations of AKI during CisP therapy with CKD and ≥eBP at 12 and 36 months(M) post-therapy end; 2) whether CKD and ≥eBP at 3M are associated with CKD and ≥eBP at 12 and 36M after CisP therapy end. Methods: Multicenter prospective study of children treated with CisP followed throughout therapy and for 36M post-therapy end. Exclusion: pre-existing kidney conditions. Urine, blood, BP collected at 3, 12, and 36M post-CisP therapy. Exposures: a) serum creatinine (SCr)-AKI any time during CisP therapy, per KDIGO; b) severe electrolyte-defined AKI (eAKI) during CisP therapy per National Cancer Institute (NCI) v4.0 criteria; c) composite AKI (SCr-AKI and severe eAKI); d) presence of CKD or ≥eBP at 3M post-CisP therapy end. Outcomes at 12 and 36M post-CisP therapy: a) CKD (per KDIGO); b)≥eBP (per AAP guidelines); c) composite of CKD or ≥eBP. Analysis: 1) multiple logistic regression (MLR) to evaluate AKI – outcome association (stepwise covariate selection); 2) MLR to evaluate association between 3M and 12M/36M outcomes (for AKI interaction). Results: Table shows prevalence of CKD and ≥eBP at 12 and 36M. Patients with SCr-AKI, eAKI and composite AKI were more likely to have ≥eBP at 12M. CKD or ≥eBP at 3M did not predict outcome presence at 12 and 36M (Table 1). However, patients with vs. without CKD at 12M were 4.8 times more likely to have CKD at 36M (Table 1). Conclusion: HTN and CKD were common at 12 and 36M post-CisP therapy. AKI during therapy was associated with ≥eBP at 12M, but the presence of kidney or BP outcomes at 3M did not predict later CKD or HTN. Novel methods to predict kidney health outcomes and interventions to reduce AKI during therapy should be investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicElectrolyte and hormonal disordersFrench-language works237,207