MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403834198 · doi:10.1681/asn.2024s8geactn

Age-Stratified Cost of Care in CKD: Real-World Data from a Retrospective Cohort Study

2024· article· en· W4403834198 on OpenAlexaff
Satabdi Chatterjee, Adrian R. Levy, Sydnie Stackland, Lindsay G.S. Bengtson, B.M.K. Donato

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetrospective cohort studyMedicineCohortIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects an estimated 14% of US adults, and is more common in those aged 65 years or older, than younger age groups. Little is known regarding the costs of CKD by age. In a large cohort of patients with prevalent CKD, this study described the mean total and direct medical costs accrued in the overall and age-stratified cohorts. Methods: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted using Optum® Market Clarity electronic health record-linked claims data. The study cohort included adults with 2 estimated glomerular filtration rates <60 ml/min/1.73m2 (3-12 months apart) followed by an ICD 9/10 code for CKD, and 1-year of continuous enrolment pre- and post-CKD diagnosis. These included patients diagnosed before January 1, 2020 plus new cases arising in 2020 (prevalent cohort); subjects who died or disenrolled in 2020 were excluded upon censoring. Total costs including direct medical costs (inpatient, outpatient, emergency department) as well as medications were calculated for the prevalent CKD cohort for the year 2020. Mean costs per patient were computed for the overall cohort and by age groups. Results: In 2020, there were 214,631 patients with CKD, consisting of: 7,270 (3.4%) aged 18-49 y; 44,879 (20.9%) aged 50-64 y; 115,070 (53.6%) aged 65-80 y; and 47,412 (22.1%) aged >81 y. The mean (SD) total and medical costs were $68,095 (139,099) and $48,379 (104,185), respectively. Cost breakdown by age groups showed annual mean total costs of: $82,958 (203,481), $76,073 (170,039), $69,675 (135,308), and $54,432 (95,669), among the 18-49, 50-64, 65-80, and >81 y subgroups, respectively. Total medical costs were $53,388 (139,247), $50,826 (126,435), $49,614 (101,644), and $42,297 (76,868), respectively, ranging from 64% in those aged 18-49 to 78% among those >81 y. Conclusion: In a large cohort of insured patients with prevalent CKD, medical costs accounted for nearly two-thirds of the total costs, and this proportion increased in older age groups. Better understanding of the drivers of medical costs by age along with other sociodemographic and clinical characteristics can provide critical insights on surveillance of CKD, and consequently, informing optimal strategies for reducing the burden of CKD. Funding: Commercial Support - Boehringer Ingelheim

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicDialysis and Renal Disease Management→French-language works237,207→