MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403836638 · doi:10.1155/2024/6496088

An Update on Reported Variants in the Skeletal Muscle <i>α</i>‐Actin (<i>ACTA1</i>) Gene

2024· review· en· W4403836638 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Joshua S. Clayton, Mridul Johari, Rhonda L. Taylor, Lein Dofash, Gavin Monahan, Peter J. Houweling, Gianina Ravenscroft, Nigel G. Laing

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Mutation · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Western AustraliaRaine Medical Research FoundationYork UniversityFrench Muscular Dystrophy AssociationMedical Research CouncilAssociation Française contre les MyopathiesStan Perron Charitable FoundationAustralian GovernmentNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMuscular Dystrophy Association
KeywordsBiologyActinSkeletal muscleGeneGeneticsSarcomereCell biologyMyocyteAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ACTA1 gene encodes skeletal muscle alpha‐actin, which forms the core of the sarcomeric thin filament in adult skeletal muscle. ACTA1 represents one of six highly conserved actin proteins that have all been associated with human disease. The first 15 pathogenic variants in ACTA1 were reported in 1999, which expanded to 177 in 2009. Here, we update on the now 607 total variants reported in LOVD, HGMD, and ClinVar, which includes 343 reported pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants. We also provide suggested ACTA1‐specific modifications to ACMG variant interpretation guidelines based on our analysis of known variants, gnomAD reports, and pathogenicity in other actin isoforms. Using these criteria, we report a total of 447 P/LP ACTA1 variants. From a clinical perspective, the number of reported ACTA1 disease phenotypes has grown from five to 20, albeit with some overlap. The vast majority (74%) of ACTA1 variants cause nemaline myopathy (NEM), but there are increasing numbers that cause cardiomyopathy and novel phenotypes such as distal myopathy. We highlight challenges associated with identifying genotype–phenotype correlations for ACTA1. Finally, we summarize key animal models and review the current state of preclinical treatments for ACTA1 disease. This update provides important resources and recommendations for the study and interpretation of ACTA1 variants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman MutationSame topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207