MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403837037 · doi:10.15353/cjo.v86i3.5612

Herpes Simplex Epithelial Keratitis and Contact lens: A Case Report

2024· article· en· W4403837037 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Ziqing Li

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContact lensKeratitisSimplexHerpes simplex virusMedicineOptometryVirologyDermatologyOphthalmologyMathematicsVirusCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herpes simplex virus keratitis is an ocular infection arising from the reactivation of HSV; if not promptly addressed, it can lead to diminished visual acuity and potential blindness in the affected eye. The sight-threatening aspects of this infection are primarily associated with the development of scarring and opacity. A 22-year-old woman, an otherwise healthy contact lens wearer, sought medical attention with complaints of painful, red, and photophobic eyes. Upon examination, a dendritic ulcer was observed on the right eye, accompanied by toxic keratopathy in both eyes. The treatment regimen that was implemented consisted of valacyclovir and ocular lubrication. The disruption of the host's natural immunological barriers, exacerbated by suboptimal contact lens handling, paved the way for subsequent dendritic ulceration. This occurrence was instigated by the reactivation of the herpes simplex virus, underscoring the critical importance of timely intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0110.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometrySame topicOcular Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207