Discordance between symptomatic response and changes in cardiac structure and function one year after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Symptomatic improvement is one of the main goals of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. We hypothesized that the degree of symptomatic response after TAVI is associated with improvement in cardiac structure and function after TAVI. Purpose We aimed to evaluate 1) the change in symptomatic burden measured by New York Heart Association (NYHA) and Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) functional class after TAVI, 2) the change in echocardiographic structural and functional parameters after TAVI, and 3) the association of symptomatic response with echocardiographic response as well as long-term survival. Methods In patients undergoing TAVI, we assessed New York Heart Association (NYHA) and Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) functional class at 12 months. Symptomatic response was defined as NYHA/CCS class I or ≥ 1 improvement in NYHA/CCS class compared to baseline at 12 months. Echocardiographic images at baseline and 6-18 months post-TAVI were analysed using an automated, validated, deep-learning workflow. Logistic regression was used to assess association between change in echocardiographic parameters and symptomatic change at 12 months. The association of symptomatic response and echocardiographic changes in the first 12 months after TAVI with survival beyond 12 months, was evaluated by landmark analysis using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results Among 868 TAVI patients (median age 80 years, 53% female), the majority (74%) had NYHA/CCS class III at baseline and 77% of patients experienced improvement in symptoms at 12 months post-TAVI (Figure 1). Patients without an improvement in symptoms more often had COPD, atrial fibrillation and more heart failure medications compared to responders. Left ventricular systolic function did not show improvement compared to baseline, whereas a modest improvement in left atrial volume index, left ventricular mass index, E/A ratio, E/e’ ratio, mean e’ and tricuspid regurgitation peak jet velocity was observed. Symptomatic response was not associated with echocardiographic response. Beyond 12 months, patients with symptomatic improvement had lower mortality than those without symptomatic improvement (1.5 vs. 2.4 per 10 patient years; p = .001), whereas changes in echocardiographic parameters were not associated with subsequent mortality (Figure 2). Conclusion Patients undergoing TAVI for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, showed substantial symptomatic improvement at one year after the procedure, whereas only a modest improvement in echocardiographic parameters was observed. Improvement in symptoms was not associated with improvement in echocardiographic measures of cardiac structure and function. Symptomatic improvement, but not improvement in cardiac structure and function at 12 months, was a strong predictor of subsequent survival.Change in NYHA/CCS class after TAVISymptoms and echo versus mortality
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".