MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prevalence, determinants, and impact of significant shunt after percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure

2024· article· en· W4403837666 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Guedeney, Julio I. Farjat‐Pasos, C Dauphin, Jérémie Abtan, Vincent Roule, Patrick Ohlmann, Fang Huang, Giorgia Ferrari, Paul Gabrion, Vincent Auffret, Guillaume Cayla, Penny Barsoum, J Rodés-Cabau, G Montalescot

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePatent foramen ovalePercutaneousShunt (medical)Closure (psychology)CardiologyInternal medicineSurgeryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale closure is increasingly performed for secondary prevention of PFO-related arterial embolic event. The clinical significance of postclosure residual right-to-left significant shunt remains unclear. Purpose To describe the prevalence, determinants, and clinical impact of a significant post-closure. Methods The AIR-FORCE is an ongoing prospective international registry of patients undergoing PFO closure from 19 centers in France, Canada and Italy. Only patients undergoing PFO for secondary prevention of an arterial embolic event with at least one available post-closure contrast transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with agitated saline injection and Valsalva maneuvers were analyzed. Residual shunt was categorized according to the number of bubbles in the left atrial within 3 cardiac cycles at the first available contrast TTE as small (<10), moderate (10-20) or severe (> 20). Determinants of the presence of moderate or severe shunt were evaluated with multivariate logistic regression and its impact on the primary outcome (stroke, transient ischemic attack or peripheral arterial emboly) was evaluated with Cox model adjusted on age and sex. Results A total of 2413 patients, with a median age of 49.3 [40.4-57.4] years, 56% male, undergoing PFO closure between 2001 and 2023 were included. The first contrast TTE, which was performed after a median delay of 3.4 [0.9-5.8] months, reported the presence of moderate or severe residual shunt in 214 (8.9% 95%CI 7.8-10.1) patients. Determinants of the presence of moderate or severe residual shunt at the first contrast TTE were decreased body mass index (per 1kg/m², aOR 0.96 95%CI 0.93-0.99), severe shunt prior to PFO closure (aOR 3.54 95%CI 2.25-5.55) and increased device left disc diameter (per 1mm, aOR 1.08 95%CI 1.05-1.12). With a median follow-up of 2.2 [0.9-4.9] years, a total of 60 events were reported and the presence of moderate or severe residual shunt was associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome (aHR 2.46 95%CI 1.15-5.24) (Figure 1). Conclusions A moderate to severe residual right-to-left intracardiac shunt is not uncommon after PFO percutaneous closure and seems to be associated with an increased risk of arterial emboly recurrence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicCardiovascular and Diving-Related ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207