Multi-label Random Subspace Ensemble Classification
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, we develop a new ensemble learning framework, multi-label Random Subspace Ensemble (mRaSE), for multi-label classification. Given a base classifier (e.g., multinomial logistic regression, classification tree, K-nearest neighbors), mRaSE works by first randomly sampling a collection of subspaces, then choosing the best ones that achieve the minimum cross-validation errors and, finally, aggregating the chosen weak learners. In addition to its superior prediction performance, mRaSE also provides a model-free feature ranking depending on the given base classifier. An iterative version of mRaSE is also developed to further improve the performance. A model-free extension is pursued on the iterative version, leading to the so-called Super mRaSE, which accepts a collection of base classifiers as input to the algorithm. We show the proposed algorithms compared favorably with the state-of-the-art classification algorithm including random forest and deep neural network, via extensive simulation studies and two real data applications. The new algorithms are implemented in an updated version of the R package RaSEn.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it