Prevalence and outcomes of patients with discordant high gradient aortic stenosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Conflicting prognostic results have been reported in patients with discordant high gradient aortic stenosis (DHG-AS, the combination of a mean pressure gradient ≥40 mmHg and an aortic valve area (AVA) >1cm² ). Moreover, existing studies only included selected patients without concomitant aortic regurgitation. Purpose We assessed the prevalence and survival of patients presenting with DHG-AS in an unselected group of consecutive patients presenting to the echocardiography laboratory of a tertiary referral center. Methods 3,547 adult patients with AVA ≤1.5cm² and peak aortic jet velocity ≥2.5m/s or mean gradient ≥25mmHg who presented between 2005 and 2015 were included. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic data, and, when available, aortic valve calcium score (AVC) were collected in an institutional database, with subsequent retrospective analysis. The primary endpoint was all cause mortality during follow-up. Results DHG-AS was observed in 163 patients (11.6% of all patients with a gradient ≥ 40mmHg). After adjustment for potential confounders, overall mortality rate of patients with DHG-AS was similar to that of concordant severe AS (AVA ≤1cm², mean gradient ≥40mmHg; CSev-AS) patients (N=1,243; HR: 0.98[0.68;-1.44]; p=0.91), and discordant low gradient-AS (AVA ≤1cm²; gradient <40 mmHg; HGDLG-AS) patients (N=1,131, HR: 0.85[0.58-1.26]; p=0.42), and was worse than that of concordant moderate AS (AVA >1.0cm², gradient <40mmHg; CMod-AS) patients (N=1,010; HR: 0.54[0.36-0.81]; p=0.003, Fig 1). After adjustment for aortic velocities, aortic regurgitation had no significant impact on survival. Calcium scoring was performed in 716 patients, including 40 patients with DHG-AS. AVC in DHG-AS was higher than in patients with CMod-AS and DLG-AS, and not significantly different from that of CSev-AS. The AVC ratio (AVC divided by the sex-specific thresholds) was higher in patients with DHG-AS as compared to both CMod-AS and DLG-AS patients (Fig 2). Conclusions DHG-AS is not uncommon. Although an AVA ≥1.0 cm² is often seen as reassuring and mistaken as moderate AS, a high-pressure gradient conveys a poor prognosis, whatever the AVA and independently of the presence of concomitant aortic regurgitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".