Additional Advantages for Agronomic Performance and Fruit Quality in Tomato Hybrids of the Saladette Type Derived from a Dwarf Male Parent
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tomatoes have tremendous economic, social, and nutritional importance. Among the various types of tomatoes, the Saladette/Italian stands out as an important cultivar for both fresh consumption and industrial processing. The production of this vegetable requires investments exceeding USD 30,000.00. Strategies that increase productivity to offset these costs are fundamental. One proposal to increase yield potential in tomato is the production of new hybrids using dwarf male parents as donors through an organized backcross breeding scheme. The present study, therefore, evaluated possible improvements in the agronomic performance and fruit quality of Saladette hybrids obtained from crosses between normal and dwarf inbred lines. Seventeen tomato hybrids obtained from three backcrosses (BC1, BC2, and BC3) and two commercial cultivars as a control (cv. Bento and Vivacy) were evaluated. The data were analyzed using the Scott–Knott test, and artificial neural networks were used to study the dissimilarities among the hybrids. The hybrids obtained from the dwarf male parent exhibited morphological changes in the plants, including a reduction in internodes, a greater number of bunches per linear meter of plant, and biofortification of the fruits. Notably, from the second backcross onwards, increases in fruit productivity and quality were observed when creating hybrid combinations from dwarf male parents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it