Coxsackievirus B3-Induced m6A Modification of RNA Enhances Viral Replication via Suppression of YTHDF-Mediated Stress Granule Formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most prevalent internal RNA modification. Here, we demonstrate that coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3), a common causative agent of viral myocarditis, induces m6A modification primarily at the stop codon and 3′ untranslated regions of its genome. As a positive-sense single-stranded RNA virus, CVB3 replicates exclusively in the cytoplasm through a cap-independent translation initiation mechanism. Our study shows that CVB3 modulates the expression and nucleo-cytoplasmic transport of the m6A machinery components—METTL3, ALKBH5 and YTHDFs—resulting in increased m6A modifications that enhance viral replication. Mechanistically, this enhancement is mediated through YTHDF-driven stress granule (SG) formation. We observed that YTHDF proteins co-localize with human antigen R (HuR), a protein facilitating cap-independent translation, in SGs during early infection. Later in infection, YTHDFs are cleaved, suppressing SG formation. Notably, for the first time, we identified that during early infection CVB3’s RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (3D) and double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) are stored in SGs, co-localizing with HuR. This early-stage sequestration likely protects viral components for use in late-phase replication, when SGs are disrupted due to YTHDF cleavage. In summary, our findings reveal that CVB3-induced m6A modifications enhance viral replication by regulating YTHDF-mediated SG dynamics. This study provides a potential therapeutic strategy for CVB3-induced myocarditis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Bench or experimental | high |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".