Exploring the effects of mavacamten through hemodynamic force analysis in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Mavacamten is a first-in-class allosteric myosin inhibitor effective in relieving left ventricular (LV) outflow tract obstruction in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM). To date, however, its effect on cardiac mechanics is still unclear. Hemodynamic force (HDF) analysis represents the fluid dynamics correlate of deformation imaging, showing a greater sensitivity in detecting early mechanical abnormalities or response to treatment [1]. Purpose To explore the in vivo effect of mavacamten on cardiac mechanics in patients with HCM after a 3 year-treatment, using HDF analysis. Methods LV HDF analysis was performed in 6 patients with oHCM (representing a cohort of the MAVA-LTE study) at baseline and after 3 years of treatment. Apical 4-, 2-, and 3-chamber echocardiographic views were analysed using a dedicated and sofisticated software. Base-apex forces (where positive deflections represent a force directed from the apex to the base of LV, whilst negative ones are directed toward the LV apex) were assessed in terms of timing indexed to cardiac cycle duration. HDF curves from the 6 patients treated with macavamten were compared to those obtained from oHCM patients (n=20), non-obstructive HCM (noHCM) patients (n=20), and healthy controls (n=22). Results Figure 1 shows a different pattern of transition between diastole and systole in HCM patients compared to controls. Specifically, HCM patients exhibited an earlier onset of the systolic phase, expressed as a fusion of late diastolic deceleration and systolic thrust. This was numerically represented as a decrease in diastolic-systolic transition time, which is 0.22 [0.20-0.24] for oHCM, 0.23 [0.21-0.25] for noHCM and 0.26 [0.26-0.30] for controls (p ≤0.001 for control vs oHCM, p ≤0.01 for control vs noHCM). Additionally, HCM patients showed an increased rate of force generation. The time to systolic peak (i.e., time interval from the onset of systole to the maximum force) was reduced in HCM patients compared to controls, and was shorter in oHCM than in noHCM patients (0.13 [0.11-0.15] vs 0.16 [0.14-0.17], p ≤0.01), thus reflecting an increased clinotropism in HCM. After 3 years of mavacamten treatment, the diastolic-systolic transition time and the time to systolic peak returned to a level similar to that of healthy controls (0.30 [0.27-0.30] in mavacamten group vs 0.26 [0.26-0.30], p >0.05, and 0.21 [0.20-0.22] vs 0.19[0.17-0.20], p=0.04, respectively) (Figure 2). Conclusion HDF analysis reveals that mavacamten affects the duration of transition from diastole to systole and prolongs time from the onset to the peak in systole. These findings may explain the removal of the mechanical coupling substrate responsible for the systolic anterior movement of mitralic leaflets and the subsequent resolution of LV outflow tract obstruction by mavacamten.Distribution of time parameters
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".