Iron Isotopes reveal volcanogenic input during Oceanic Anoxic Event 2 (OAE 2 ∼ 94 Ma)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anomalously high metal concentrations including iron enrichments are recorded in marine carbonates deposited during Ocean Anoxic Event 2 (OAE 2). These metal enrichments have been attributed to massive submarine eruptions during the formation of one or more large igneous provinces, the proposed trigger for OAE 2 (hydrothermal hypothesis), or to the release of metals from the reoxidation of formerly anoxic marine sediment during a period of temporary cooling during OAE 2 (sediment release hypothesis). Here we use iron stable isotopes to help distinguish between the two hypotheses for a trace metal enriched interval during OAE 2 in the Iona-1 core in the Western Interior Seaway, Texas. Our results show a two-step negative excursion during OAE 2 that is coincident with osmium isotope volcanic proxies measured in the same core, with peak negative values centered on a trace metal-enriched interval. After corrections for detrital and locally supplied iron to the study setting, the δ 56 Fe value of the remotely supplied iron is –0.28 ± 0.05 ‰, falling in the range of iron δ 56 Fe values observed in modern hydrothermal plumes (–0.1 to –0.5 ‰), thus supporting the hydrothermal hypothesis as the source of iron and other associated trace metals enriched in the study core during OAE 2. By contrast, the sediment release hypothesis predicts much lower δ 56 Fe values, between –1.0 ‰ to –3.3 ‰ predicted for benthic supplies of iron from anoxic marine sediment overlying re-oxygenated bottom waters. This study shows that combining iron with other proxies for environmental change, particularly submarine volcanism, can distinguish hydrothermally supplied iron from dust, rivers, and shelf sediment supplies of iron despite iron’s reputation for complicated cycling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".