Rumen fermentation shifts and microbial dynamics in mid-lactating Holstein dairy cows experiencing heat stress and subsequent recovery periods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigated the effects of heat stress (HS) on rumen fermentation, blood parameters, and ruminal microbial communities in mid-lactating Holstein dairy cows in Korea. METHODS: Our study involved 12 mid-lactation Holstein dairy cows aged 55.54 months with 2.5±0.65 parities and 100 to 200 days in milking (DIM), fed a total mixed ratio diet. Samples were collected during HS (temperature-humidity index [THI] = 81.69) and recovery (RC) period (THI 69.84). The samples were analyzed for rumen fermentation, blood parameters, heat shock proteins, and microbial communities in dairy cows. RESULTS: The milk yield, milk fat, milk protein, and milk urea nitrogen levels differed significantly between two-time points (p<0.05). Rumen pH and volatile fatty acid concentrations, the pH was not significantly different (p = 0.619) between HS and RC periods; however, the ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) levels increased during HS period ), however, there was no significant difference (p>0.05). Blood total protein significantly increased during HS period compared with that during RC period (p<0.05), while no significant differences were observed in other parameters between the two periods. HSP27, HSP70, and HSP90 increased in dairy cows under HS conditions compared with those during the RC period. Taxonomic classification revealed that Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes dominated the bacterial community. PERMANOVA and PERMDISP showed significant differences in rumen bacterial diversity between HS and RC periods, based on Unifrac metrics (p = 0.044 and p = 0.015, respectively), indicating taxonomic variations. Microbial networks with correlations of >0.8 (p<0.05) showed a complex structure with equal positive and negative connections, indicating Anaerohabdus furcosa and Ruminiclostridium cellobioparum as key species during the HS and RC periods respectively. CONCLUSION: HS significantly impacts Holstein dairy cows' physiological and metabolic processes, altering rumen fermentation, blood biochemistry, and gut microbiota during mid-lactation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".