MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403848735 · doi:10.17352/amp.000135

What is Light, Really? A Quantum Dialectical View

2024· article· en· W4403848735 on OpenAlexaff
Abdul Malek

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Mathematics and Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Applications
Canadian institutionsAxdev Group (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDialecticQuantumTheoretical physicsPsychologyPhysicsEpistemologyPhilosophyQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radiant energy in the form of visible light has been and still remains the most mysterious and venerated object in human history. Gradual understanding of the nature of light now in its very wide range of energy, both above and below the visible range; has led to the proliferation of technologies, especially after the recognition of its quantum nature. Although impressive knowledge about the nature of light, its properties, its source, and its interaction with other existing matter, etc., have been gained and profitably utilized in technologies; its fundamental unit as a discrete point particle or an extended continuous wavelet, as well as its mass, still remains a subject of intense debate among the physicists.Understanding the enigmatic properties and the nature of light as difficult as it proved to be; understanding the velocity of its propagation proved to be the most misunderstood aspect of light. As has been shown through some recent publications by this author, the false axiomatic notion of Albert Einstein at the turn of the 20th century, about the universal and absolute constancy (in vacuum) of the velocity c of light; caused the century-long confusion, paradoxes, myths and ironically, the darkest period of modern physics and cosmology! Another wrong centuries-old axiomatic notion of Isaac Newton about the one-sided universal gravitational attraction of matter, acted in a synergistic way with Einstein’s false axiomatic notion about light; to create the modern and sophisticated ruling mythology of the “Big Bang” creation of the universe, undermining scientific progress both in theoretical physics and in cosmology, since Copernicus and Johannes Kepler.It can now be demonstrated that this new mythology has absolutely no basis in objective reality and is the product of brain-cooked and abstract mathematical fabrications based on an axiomatic truth and apparently willful deceptions by official science. A quantum dialectical approach reveals that light is composed of point particles (photons) with a wide range of energy, velocity, and mass; over the whole electromagnetic spectrum, from the microwave to the highest energy gamma-ray photons. The only difference from other matter particles is that photons exist only in their free elementary state and are created instantly (until absorbed) from their virtual existence in matter atoms or in the quantum vacuum; in this infinite, eternal, and ever-changing universe; thereby resolving all mysteries about light.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Mathematics and PhysicsSame topicQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207