Characterization of Laboratory-Confirmed Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease From 3 Ontario Tertiary Care Centers Between 2012 and 2022: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Globally, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) affects one in one million people annually, but there is a paucity of recent Canadian data. This study summarizes epidemiology trends and diagnostic timelines of laboratory-confirmed CJD cases in three tertiary Ontario hospitals. Method Using laboratory information systems, we identified 30 patients with a laboratory-confirmed CJD diagnosis between 2012 and 2022 at three major tertiary hospitals in Ontario. Retrospective chart reviews were then completed. Results Patients had a mean of 2.2 hospital visits (SD, 1.2) prior to being admitted for testing. The most common symptom presentations included loss of coordination (63.3%), behavioral changes (60%), progressive mobility loss (53.4%), memory loss (50.0%), and involuntary movements (50.0%). Magnetic resonance imaging findings showed potential CJD in 76.7% of cases, and 56.7% exhibited periodic sharp wave complexes characteristic of CJD on electroencephalogram. The mean duration from symptom onset to microbiologic testing was 91 days (SD, 90.7). End-point quaking-induced conversion (EP-QuIC) testing of cerebrospinal fluid was positive in 90.0% of patients, while 83.3% tested positive for 14-3-3 on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Elevated cerebrospinal fluid 14-3-3 levels significantly correlated with shorter duration from symptom onset to death (R2 = 0.71, F = 19.55, P = .0022). Post-diagnosis, 46.7% of patients were discharged home, 16.6% were transferred to external palliative care or hospice facilities, and 36.7% died during admission. The mean time from symptom onset to death was 121 days (SD, 120.7), and from diagnosis to death 35 days (SD, 83.9). Conclusions This study highlights the importance of early CJD consideration and laboratory testing when appropriate neurologic symptoms are present.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".