Association Between <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> Sensitization and Insulin Resistance Among US Adults Screened for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may be a long-term sequela of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) by mechanisms that remain to be fully explained. We evaluated the association between Mtb sensitization and T2DM and, via mediation analysis, the extent to which it is mediated by insulin resistance and/or β-cell failure. Methods Adults were assessed for T2DM by fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance testing, and hemoglobin A1c; β-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance by homoeostasis model assessment 2; and Mtb sensitization by tuberculin skin testing. Associations between Mtb sensitization and T2DM were modeled with probit regression and decomposed into indirect effects of β-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance. Analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical characteristics. Results We included 1843 adults. Individuals with Mtb sensitization were older than those without Mtb (median [IQR], 54 [39–64] vs 47 [33–62] years). As compared with being uninfected, Mtb sensitization was associated with T2DM (adjusted absolute risk difference, 9.34% [95% CI, 2.38%–15.0%]; P &lt; .001) and increased insulin resistance (adjusted median difference, 0.16 [95% CI, .03–.29]; P = .014) but not β-cell dysfunction (adjusted median difference, −3.1 [95% CI, −10.4 to 4.3]; P = .42). In mediation analyses, insulin resistance mediated 18.3% (95% CI, 3.29%–36.0%; P = .020) of the total effect of the association between Mtb sensitization and T2DM. Conclusions Definitive prospective studies examining incident T2DM following tuberculosis are warranted. Notwithstanding, our findings suggest that exposure to Mtb may be a novel risk factor for T2DM, likely driven by an increase in insulin resistance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".