MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403869183 · doi:10.5751/es-15387-290412

Living community cookbook: transdisciplinary collaboration for constructing recipes with biocultural value

2024· article· en· W4403869183 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Carolina Gutiérrez Sánchez, Claudia Leyva Aguilera, Rebeca Moreno-Santoyo, L. Rivera, Sandra Carrillo, Lluvia Dorantes Herrera

Bibliographic record

VenueEcology and Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicOrganic Food and Agriculture
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsValue (mathematics)GeographySociologyEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningComputer scienceEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research aims to delve into food knowledge and practices concerning the ecological management of food resources, spanning procurement, transformation, and consumption processes, through the lens of creating a cookbook as a tool for decolonizing food knowledge and practices. The impetus for crafting a cookbook alongside an indigenous community in northwestern Mexico stems from the dynamic process of exchanging ecological and food knowledge, where the following questions are posed: What foundational knowledge and essential ingredients underlie the community's food system? And how might the cookbook serve as a catalyst for knowledge exchange and transdisciplinary collaboration? Adopting a qualitative approach, the research employs participatory methodology, involving workshops with women from the Kumiai community of San José de la Zorra, Baja California, Mexico. These workshops aim to spotlight the diversity of foods sourced from the collection of wild species/seasonal crops and to glean insights into the perspectives on food culture from the region. As a result, the study unveils ingredients cultivated and gathered across different seasons, offering a glimpse into the community’s rich food knowledge. A design proposal is articulated to craft recipes that not only respect the essence of the community’s way of life but also resonate with the profound connection people have to the territory. Moreover, the research delves into the significance of decolonizing cookbooks by amplifying indigenous food knowledge and reclaiming narratives from a biocultural perspective. The cookbook emerges as a tool for igniting dialogue about food in relation with the social-ecological context of indigenous and rural communities in northwestern Mexico. Furthermore, it proposes that this model can be adapted to other contexts, needs, and preferences, thereby effectively linking food and territory while challenging dominant culinary narratives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0020.014
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcology and Society→Same topicOrganic Food and Agriculture→French-language works237,207→