MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403872462 · doi:10.3390/biology13110878

Comparison of Physiological Stress Indices in Anesthetized and Manually Restrained Leopard Sharks, Triakis semifasciata

2024· article· en· W4403872462 on OpenAlexaff
Meghan M. Holst, Catharine J. Wheaton, Alexandra N. Schoen, Jill V. Spangenberg, Kevin T. McEligot, Melissa L. Schouest, Charlene M. Burns, Natalie D. Mylniczenko

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIchthyology and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyLeopardZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Leopard sharks (Triakis semifasciata) are abundant, coastal, eastern Pacific, mesopredatory sharks and are frequently managed in aquariums and zoos. Medical examinations are a routine part of good husbandry practices, but the handling protocols vary greatly between facilities. In this study, we compared the physiological stress responses of T. semifasciata associated with manual restraint and sedated handling under parallel holding and handling procedures in a 10 min interval. Methods: Blood was collected and analyzed for the hematocrit (Hct), lactate, glucose, beta-hydroxybutyrate (β-HB), pH, blood gasses, 1α-hydroxycorticosterone (1α-OHB), and corticosterone (B). Results: Overall, a minimal physiological stress response was observed in both groups. However, statistically significant increases in the PCO2, β-HB and lactate occurred, while the pHTC, SO2, and BE decreased over time in the manual-restraint group. In the sedated group, the B, PCO2, and lactate increased while the pHTC, SO2, and base excess (BE) decreased over time. When comparing treatments, the sedated group had a higher B and PCO2 TC and a lower pHTC, BE, and SO2 than the manual-restraint group at the second time point. Conclusions: This study indicates that manual restraint is comparable to the described sedation in T. semifasciata for minimally invasive procedures. The overall results show that this species had low physiological stress responses to both methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiologySame topicIchthyology and Marine BiologyFrench-language works237,207