Characterization of Y chromosome diversity in newfoundland and labrador: evidence for a structured founding population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The population of Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) is largely derived from settlers who migrated primarily from England and Ireland in the 1700s-1800s. Previously described as an isolated founder population, based on historical and demographic studies, data on the genetic ancestry of this population remains fragmentary. Here we describe the largest investigation of patrilineal ancestry in NL. To determine the paternal genetic structure of the population, 1,110 Y chromosomes from an NL-based cohort were analyzed using 5,761 Y-specific SNPs. We identified 160 distinct terminal haplogroups, the majority of which (71.4%) belong to the R1b haplogroup. When compared with global reference populations, the NL population haplogroup composition and frequencies primarily resemble those observed in English and Irish ancestral source populations. There is also evidence of genetic contributions from Basque, French, Portuguese, and Spanish fishermen and early settlers who frequented NL. Interestingly, the observed population structure shows geographical and religious clustering that can be associated with the settlement of the ancestral source populations from predominantly Protestant, England, and Catholic, Ireland respectively. For example, the R1b-M222 haplogroup, seen in people of Irish descent, is found clustered in the Irish-settled Southeast region of NL. The clustering and expansion of Y haplogroups in conjunction with the geographical and religious clusters illustrate that limited subsequent in-migration, geographic isolation, and societal factors have contributed to the genetic substructure of the NL population and its designation as a founder population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".