Smart Compression Sock for Early Detection of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The prevention of diabetic foot ulcers remains a critical challenge. This study evaluates a smart compression sock designed to address this issue by integrating temperature, plantar pressure, and blood oxygen sensors and monitoring data recorded by these sensors. The smart sock, developed with input from a certified Pedorthist, was tested on 20 healthy adult participants aged 16 to 53. It includes four temperature sensors and pressure sensors at common ulcer sites (first and fifth metatarsal heads, calcaneus, and hallux), and a blood oxygen sensor on the hallux. The sensors are monitored, and their transduced data are collected and stored through an app installed on a personal cell phone. The mobile app interface is user-friendly, providing intuitive navigation and easy access to the sensors' data. Using repeated measures ANOVA and post hoc tests, we analyzed the impact of various physical activities on physiological changes in the foot. The device effectively detected significant variations in blood oxygen, temperature, and pressure across six activities. Statistical analyses revealed significant differences based on activity type and sensor location. These results highlight the smart sock's sensitivity and accuracy, suggesting its potential to prevent diabetic foot ulcers. Further clinical trials are needed to evaluate its efficacy in a larger, more diverse population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".