Functional interaction between transcription factor Sfp1 and the NuA4 complex in response to nutrient availability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ribosome biogenesis is a crucial process requiring enormous transcriptional output. In budding yeast, the expression of 138 ribosomal protein (RP) genes and over 200 ribosome biogenesis (RiBi) genes is regulated by an intricate network of factors, including the nutrient-sensitive transcription activator Sfp1 and the NuA4 coactivator/acetyltransferase complex. Nutrient starvation or inhibition of TORC1 by rapamycin leads to repression of RP and RiBi genes, in part through blocking Sfp1 nuclear localization and NuA4-dependent chromatin acetylation. Here, we demonstrate that Sfp1 physically interacts with NuA4 in a TORC1-dependent manner. Our results indicate that Sfp1, along with NuA4, regulate the transcription of RiBi and RP genes via distinct mechanisms depending on promoter architectures. Sfp1 promotes histone acetylation at the promoters without affecting NuA4 recruitment. In contrast, NuA4 does impact Sfp1 binding but specifically at two classes of RP genes. Importantly, NuA4 acetylates Sfp1 at lysines 655 and 657, regulating its function. Cells expressing Sfp1 with acetyl-mimicking mutations exhibit increased expression of RiBi genes while RP genes remain stable. However, the same mutants lead to the loss of Sfp1 binding/activity at RiBi genes when cells are under non-optimal growth conditions. Mimicking constitutive acetylation of Sfp1 also limits the transcriptional burst of RP genes upon addition of glucose. Altogether, these results draw an intricate functional relationship between Sfp1 and NuA4 to control ribosome biogenesis, fine-tuning transcription output in different growth conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".