MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403884712 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.03628

Supporting Data for PRX Quantum (Universal Adapters between quantum LDPC codes)

2024· preprint· en· W4403884712 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Esha Swaroop, Tomas Jochym-O’Connor, Theodore J. Yoder

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSimons Institute for the Theory of Computing, University of California BerkeleyInnovation, Science and Economic Development CanadaInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueGovernment of CanadaMinistry of Colleges and UniversitiesU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsLow-density parity-check codeComputer scienceQuantumError floorTheoretical computer sciencePhysicsAlgorithmDecoding methodsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantum LDPC surgery using auxiliary graph construction. This data accompanies arXiv:2410.03628 . The goal is to illustrate the code deformation/logical measurement scheme presented in the paper. The two small quantum LDPC codes used as examples to illustrate the scheme are [[98,6,12]] bivariate bicyclic code [[200,20,10]] lifted product code This data contains Parity check matrices (Hx and Hz) for the original quantum LDPC codes, deformed quantum LDPC codes, to- measure logicals Z_1, Z_2, Z_3 individually, as well as - measure Z_1 Z_2 jointly (multi-code), and - measure Z_1 Z_3 jointly (intra-code). Input graph and Output matrices for SkipTree algorithm (sparse basis transformation to the canonical repetition code) proposed in this paper. The code deformation scheme presented in this paper preserves code distance and maintains sparsity in the deformed quantum code.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0070.014
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207