MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Maternal-Newborn ABO Blood Groups and Risk of Bacterial Infection in Newborns

2024· article· en· W4403887790 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Emily A. Butler, Joel G. Ray, Eyal Cohen‬‏

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Network Open · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's HospitalInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsABO blood group systemMedicineGestational ageObstetricsCohortPoisson regressionPregnancyCohort studyPediatricsImmunologyPopulationInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Newborn immunity largely relies on maternal-fetal transfer of antibodies in utero. Incongruency in ABO blood groups between a mother and newborn may be associated with protection against serious infections, but data specific to newborn bacterial infections are lacking. Objective: To ascertain the association between maternal-newborn ABO blood group incongruence and lower risk of bacterial infection in newborns. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used linked patient-level datasets for all singleton live births between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020, in hospitals and health centers in Ontario, Canada. The cohort comprised maternal-newborn pairs with known ABO blood groups. Data analysis was conducted between February and May 2024. Exposure: Maternal-newborn ABO blood group incongruence vs congruence. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a bacterial infection arising in newborns within 30 days of birth. Bacterial infection was cultured from either blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, or lung specimen. Secondary outcomes were a bacterial infection with 7 days and 90 days of birth. Modified Poisson regression generated adjusted relative risks (ARRs) and 95% CIs, adjusted for neonatal sex and preterm birth. Results: A total of 138 207 maternal-newborn pairs (maternal mean [SD] age, 31.8 [5.1] years among those with ABO blood group incongruency and 31.5 [5.1] years among those with ABO blood group congruency; newborn mean [SD] gestational age, 38.5 [2.3] weeks among those with incongruency and 38.4 [2.5] weeks among those with congruency; 19 475 males [51.3%] with incongruency and 52 041 males [51.9%] with congruency) were analyzed. Of these pairs, 37 953 (27.5%) had ABO blood group incongruency and 100 254 (72.5%) had ABO blood group congruency. Within 30 days of birth, 328 (8.6 per 1000) newborns in the incongruent group and 1029 (10.3 per 1000) newborns in the congruent group experienced a bacterial infection, corresponding to an ARR of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.81-1.03). The ARRs for bacterial infection within 7 days and 90 days of birth were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.73-1.09) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.94), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found no association between maternal-newborn ABO blood group incongruence and risk of bacterial infection in newborns within 30 and 7 days of birth. However, incongruence was associated with a decreased risk of bacterial infection within 90 days of birth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA Network OpenSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207