Revealing Yukon’s hidden treasure: an atomic-scale investigation of Carlin-type gold mineralization in the Nadaleen Trend, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The invisible-gold deposits known as Carlin-type are becoming more important as easier to find deposits are progressively depleted. The combination of the invisible nature of the Au in these deposits, as well as the limited surface indicators of these deposits, makes exploration to find new Carlin-type deposits extremely difficult. Comprehensive mineralization models are essential to find new Carlin-type deposits in similar geologic settings. The Nadaleen Trend of Yukon, Canada, is one such district where an improved understanding of this deposit type has led to new discoveries. Previous studies compared and contrasted the tectonic setting, host rock depositional setting, structural preparation, and mineralization style of the Nadaleen Trend with those in Carlin-type localities, Nevada. However, the comparisons at an atomic scale, between Carlin-type Au deposits in the Nadaleen Trend and those in Nevada, has yet to be investigated. This study fills this knowledge gap by combining high resolution microanalytical techniques with atom probe tomography to examine the distribution of Au and other trace elements in the Nadaleen Trend, compare them to a representative Carlin-type deposit in Nevada (Turquoise Ridge), and determine how widespread the mineralization model is. Our findings show that in the Nadaleen Trend, as in Nevada, Au is generally directly linked with As at the macro to atomic scale, and is incorporated into As/Au rich overgrowths on sedimentary/diagenetic pyrite. Gold-rich pyrite rims in the Nadaleen Trend are generally smaller than those found in Nevada (0.5-2 µm vs > 10 µm), although the ore grades appear comparable. We find that the Au in the pyrite of the Nadaleen Trend is homogenously distributed (i.e. lattice bound) at the atomic scale, but that there is a notable enrichment of As surrounding individual Au atoms. These findings are in agreement with those from previous work on a representative deposit in Nevada, and support the assertation that As is the key ingredient in facilitating the incorporation of Au into the pyrite lattice. Arsenic as an essential component in the trapping mechanisms of Au in CTG deposits, is something that has been as to yet underappreciated in the current models of CTG deposit formation. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00126-024-01325-9.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".