PilY1 regulates the dynamic architecture of the type IV pilus machine in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Type IV pili (T4P) produced by the pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa play a pivotal role in adhesion, surface motility, biofilm formation, and infection in humans. Despite the significance of T4P as a potential therapeutic target, key details of their dynamic assembly and underlying molecular mechanisms of pilus extension and retraction remain elusive, primarily due to challenges in isolating intact T4P machines from the bacterial cell envelope. Here, we combine cryo-electron tomography with subtomogram averaging and integrative modelling to resolve in-situ architectural details of the dynamic T4P machine in P. aeruginosa cells. The T4P machine forms 7-fold symmetric cage-like structures anchored in the cell envelope, providing a molecular framework for the rapid exchange of major pilin subunits during pilus extension and retraction. Our data suggest that the T4P adhesin PilY1 forms a champagne-cork-shaped structure, effectively blocking the secretin channel in the outer membrane whereas the minor-pilin complex in the periplasm appears to contact PilY1 via the central pore of the secretin gate. These findings point to a hypothetical model where the interplay between the secretin protein PilQ and the PilY1-minor-pilin priming complex is important for optimizing conformations of the T4P machine in P. aeruginosa, suggesting a gate-keeping mechanism that regulates pilus dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".