Optimization of a rapid, sensitive, and high throughput molecular sensor to measure canola protoplast respiratory metabolism as a means of screening nanomaterial cytotoxicity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nanomaterial-mediated plant genetic engineering holds promise for developing new crop cultivars but can be hindered by nanomaterial toxicity to protoplasts. We present a fast, high-throughput method for assessing protoplast viability using resazurin, a non-toxic dye converted to highly fluorescent resorufin during respiration. Protoplasts isolated from hypocotyl canola (Brassica napus L.) were evaluated at varying temperatures (4, 10, 20, 30 ˚C) and time intervals (1-24 h). Optimal conditions for detecting protoplast viability were identified as 20,000 cells incubated with 40 µM resazurin at room temperature for 3 h. The assay was applied to evaluate the cytotoxicity of silver nanospheres, silica nanospheres, cholesteryl-butyrate nanoemulsion, and lipid nanoparticles. The cholesteryl-butyrate nanoemulsion and lipid nanoparticles exhibited toxicity across all tested concentrations (5-500 ng/ml), except at 5 ng/ml. Silver nanospheres were toxic across all tested concentrations (5-500 ng/ml) and sizes (20-100 nm), except for the larger size (100 nm) at 5 ng/ml. Silica nanospheres showed no toxicity at 5 ng/ml across all tested sizes (12-230 nm). Our results highlight that nanoparticle size and concentration significantly impact protoplast toxicity. Overall, the results showed that the resazurin assay is a precise, rapid, and scalable tool for screening nanomaterial cytotoxicity, enabling more accurate evaluations before using nanomaterials in genetic engineering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it