White Masters and Black Servants: A Decolonial Analysis of Winky D’s “Happy Again” Music Video
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In December 2021, Zimbabwean musician Winky D (born Wallace Chirumiko) released the video to his song “Happy Again.” While many cheered the release, the “Happy Again” video was not immune to criticism. Drawing on concepts of coloniality and decoloniality as well as framing theory, this article uses thematic analysis to deconstruct the kinds of selections that perpetuate coloniality that were spotlighted and made noticeable in the “Happy Again” music video. Further, the article discusses the implications of such depictions as well as proposes possible representations that could have been less problematic. By focusing on race, this article contributes to scholarship on representations in Zimbabwean music which has predominantly examined portrayals of gender. Considering that Winky D’s artistic creation lives on YouTube where many continue to view it, this article relies on cultivation theory to justify why contesting and rejecting the problematic depictions of Blackness and Whiteness in the video is urgent. Despite the British formally leaving Zimbabwe at the country’s flag independence in 1980, the framing of Blackness and Whiteness in the video shows a continuation of imperialist ideas that anchored the colonial project. White people are framed as affluent masters while Black individuals are portrayed as poor servants. These representations have potentially deleterious consequences when embraced by credulous and unwary audiences. The article concludes by highlighting its contributions to nuancing theories used to scaffold the analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".