MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403896654 · doi:10.3389/fmars.2024.1476131

The international multi-system OSEs/OSSEs by the UN Ocean Decade Project SynObs and its early results

2024· article· en· W4403896654 on OpenAlexaff
Yosuke Fujii, Elisabeth Rémy, Magdalena Balmaseda, Shoichiro Kido, Jennifer Waters, K. Andrew Peterson, G. C. Moore Smith, Ichiro Ishikawa, Kamel Chikhar

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Marine Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal and Marine Management
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceOceanographyMeteorologyGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“Synergistic Observing Network for Ocean Prediction (SynObs)” was launched in 2022 as a project of the United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development to evaluate the importance of ocean observation systems and co-design the future evolution of the ocean observing network. SynObs is currently leading the flagship OSEs/OSSEs, an internationally coordinated activity in which observing system experiments (OSEs) and observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs) are conducted using a variety of ocean and coupled atmosphere–ocean prediction systems to evaluate ocean observation impacts consistent across most prediction systems. The flagship OSEs/OSSEs comprises the ocean prediction (OP) OSEs for high-resolution ocean predictions, the subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) OSEs for long-term lead-time coupled ocean–atmosphere predictions, and the OP OSSEs for evaluating new and future observing systems. SynObs plans to use the results of the flagship OSEs to contribute to the reports on the ocean observing network design made by international organizations and projects. Here, we introduce this initiative, and we report on some initial results. Some observation impacts consistent across four ocean prediction systems are found by a preliminary analysis of the analysis runs for the OP OSEs. For example, impacts of the altimetry data on the assimilated sea surface height (SSH) field are generally large in the westerly boundary current regions and around Antarctic Circumpolar Currents where SSH has large variability but are small in the tropical regions, despite the relatively large SSH variability there. The analysis also indicates the possibility that there are some characteristic differences in the observation impacts between low-resolution and eddy-resolving ocean prediction systems. Although OSE outputs of only four ocean prediction systems are available now, we will make further investigation, adding OSE outputs of other prediction systems that will be submitted in the near future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Marine ScienceSame topicCoastal and Marine ManagementFrench-language works237,207