MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403904912 · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2024.10.030

Gut microbiota transfer from the preclinical maternal immune activation model of autism is sufficient to induce sex-specific alterations in immune response and behavioural outcomes

2024· article· en· W4403904912 on OpenAlexafffund
Stephanie Salia, Francine F. Burke, Meagan Hinks, Alison M. Randell, Mairead Anna Matheson, Susan G. Walling, Ashlyn Swift‐Gallant

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Behavior and Immunity · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsImmune systemAutismImmunologyGut floraPsychologyNeuroscienceDevelopmental psychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Outcomes in the maternal immune activation (MIA) model of autism are sex biased. • Gut transfer from MIA to healthy mice was performed in a cross-sex design. • Female donor microbiota increased gut microbes with known neural protective effects. • Pro-inflammatory cytokines increased in male and female recipients of MIA gut transfer. • Female donor microbiota also induced protective anti-inflammatory cytokines. The gut microbiome plays a vital role in health and disease, including neurodevelopmental disorders like autism spectrum disorder (ASD). ASD affects 4:1 males-to-females, and sex differences are apparent in gut microbiota composition among ASD individuals and in animal models of this condition, such as the maternal immune activation (MIA) mouse model. However, few studies have included sex as a biological variable when assessing the role of gut microbiota in mediating ASD symptoms. Using the MIA model of ASD, we assessed whether gut microbiota contributes to the sex differences in the presentation of ASD-like behaviors. Gut microbiota transplantation from MIA or vehicle/control male and female mice into healthy, otherwise unmanipulated, 4-week-old C57Bl/6 mice was performed for 6 treatments over 12 days. Colonization with male, but not female, MIA microbiota was sufficient to reduce sociability, decrease microbiota diversity and increase neuroinflammation with more pronounced deficits in male recipients. Colonization with both male and female donor microbiota altered juvenile ultrasonic vocalizations and anxiety-like behavior in recipients of both sexes, and there was an accompanied change in the gut microbiota and serum cytokine IL-4 and IL-7 levels of all recipients of MIA gut microbiota. In addition to the increases in gut microbes associated with pathological states, the female donor microbiota profile also had increases in gut microbes with known neural protective effects (e.g., Lactobacillus and Rikenella ). These results suggest that gut reactivity to environmental insults, such as in the MIA model, may play a role in shaping the sex disparity in ASD development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain Behavior and ImmunitySame topicAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207