A cross-attention-based deep learning approach for predicting functional stroke outcomes using 4D CTP imaging and clinical metadata
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains a global health challenge, leading to long-term functional disabilities without timely intervention. Spatio-temporal (4D) Computed Tomography Perfusion (CTP) imaging is crucial for diagnosing and treating AIS due to its ability to rapidly assess the ischemic core and penumbra. Although traditionally used to assess acute tissue status in clinical settings, 4D CTP has also been explored in research for predicting stroke tissue outcomes. However, its potential for predicting functional outcomes, especially in combination with clinical metadata, remains unexplored. Thus, this work aims to develop and evaluate a novel multimodal deep learning model for predicting functional outcomes (specifically, 90-day modified Rankin Scale) in AIS patients by combining 4D CTP and clinical metadata. To achieve this, an intermediate fusion strategy with a cross-attention mechanism is introduced to enable a selective focus on the most relevant features and patterns from both modalities. Evaluated on a dataset comprising 70 AIS patients who underwent endovascular mechanical thrombectomy, the proposed model achieves an accuracy (ACC) of 0.77, outperforming conventional late fusion strategies (ACC = 0.73) and unimodal models based on either 4D CTP (ACC = 0.61) or clinical metadata (ACC = 0.71). The results demonstrate the superior capability of the proposed model to leverage complex inter-modal relationships, emphasizing the value of advanced multimodal fusion techniques for predicting functional stroke outcomes. • Integration of 4D CTP and clinical metadata to predict clinical stroke outcomes. • Novel multimodal fusion strategy using a cross-attention mechanism. • Using both data modalities leads to better results than single-modality models. • Proposed multimodal model outperforms conventional late fusion approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".