MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403910874 · doi:10.12927/hcq.2024.27437

Measurement of and Reporting on Wait Times for Priority Procedures in Canada

2024· article· en· W4403910874 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Andrey Kildyushov, Ben Reason, Mary Kwakyepeprah, M Nichols, Yasmine Léger, Xi-Kuan Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Quarterly · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Canadian institutionsCanadian Water and Wastewater AssociationCanadian Institute for Health Information
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBest practiceBusinessMedicinePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite ongoing efforts to deliver more timely care to Canadians, patients across Canada continued to wait longer for joint replacements, cancer surgery and diagnostic imaging in 2023 compared with 2019 (the pre-pandemic period). In 2023, the wait time for cataract surgery returned to the pre-pandemic level. For radiation therapy and hip fracture repair, the proportion of patients treated within the benchmark decreased slightly compared to the pre-pandemic period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.463
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare QuarterlySame topicHealthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationFrench-language works237,207