MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403912490 · doi:10.1016/j.radcr.2024.10.005

One artery to rule them all: A case of single coronary artery arising from the right sinus of Valsalva

2024· article· en· W4403912490 on OpenAlexaff
Nikolaos S. Ioakeimidis, Panagiotis Pepis, Konstantina Mitrousi, Dimitrios Valasiadis

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiology Case Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Artery Anomalies
Canadian institutionsAdidas (Canada)Regina General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSinus (botany)CardiologyRight coronary arteryArteryInternal medicineAortic sinusRadiologyCoronary angiographyMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A single coronary artery (SCA) is a rare congenital anomaly with an incidence of 0.024 - 0.066% in angiographies and potential implications for adverse events depending on the course of the anomalous artery. We present a unique case of a single coronary artery arising from the right sinus of Valsalva. A 77-year-old female presented to the emergency department with an ongoing 3-hour episode of palpitations and intermittent atypical chest pain over 1 week. Her medical history included hypertension and dyslipidemia. Electrocardiography revealed atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, which was successfully managed with intravenous amiodarone and the diagnostic workup ruled out life threatening thoracic pathology including cardiac ischemia. A CT coronary angiography was performed due to the moderate pretest probability of coronary artery disease. The scan identified a single coronary artery with a common origin of the left main coronary artery (LMCA) and the right coronary artery (RCA), from the right sinus of Valsalva, classified as Lipton Type RII-A which is a benign variant. This case highlights the importance of identifying CAAs, which are often incidental but may have clinical relevance depending on the anatomical course and associated risk factors. Early and accurate diagnosis through advanced imaging techniques is crucial to guide appropriate management and ensure optimal outcomes for the patient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiology Case ReportsSame topicCoronary Artery AnomaliesFrench-language works237,207