Energy and nutrient digestibility and effect of increasing the dietary inclusion of hull-less oats replacing wheat grain on growth performance of weanling pigs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To compare energy and nutrient digestibility , 3 diets including 95 % AC Gehl hull-less oats, CDC Utmost VB wheat or nitrogen-free were fed to 8 ileal cannulated pigs (30.2 ± 2.2 kg) over 3 periods (Exp. 1). To evaluate effects on growth performance, 160 weaned pigs (7.7 ± 0.4 kg) were fed 4 nursery diets over 28 days (Exp. 2). AC Gehl hull-less oats replaced CDC Utmost VB wheat at 0/3, 1/3, 2/3, and 3/3. Hull-less oats contained less fibre, more fat, Lys, Arg, Leu, Val but less Glu and Pro than wheat. In Exp. 1, feeding hull-less oats resulted in greater (P < 0.05) coefficient of apparent ileal digestibility (CAID) and coefficient of apparent total tract digestibility of dry matter, digestible energy and predicted net energy value than wheat. Although CAID and coefficient of standardised ileal digestibility (CSID) of crude protein and most amino acids (AA) were lower (P < 0.05) for pigs fed hull-less oats, CAID of Lys and most SID AA content were greater than wheat (P < 0.05). In Exp. 2, feeding hull-less oats replacing wheat did not affect weekly pen average daily feed disappearance, average daily weight gain or body weight ; however, overall gain-to-feed ratio decreased (P = 0.001) linearly (0.01 g/g per each 1/3 replacement). In conclusion, feeding AC Gehl hull-less oats resulted in lower CAID (except Lys) and CSID of AA, but greater SID AA content thus can fully replace CDC Utmost VB wheat grain in weanling pig diets without affecting most production parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".