MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403916138 · doi:10.1130/b37736.1

Petrogenetic relationship of the variably Ni–Cu–platinum-group element (PGE)-mineralized intrusions of the Thunder Bay North Intrusive Complex, Midcontinent Rift, Canada: Implications for mineral exploration in mafic–ultramafic complexes

2024· article· en· W4403916138 on OpenAlexaffabout
Matthew J. Brzozowski, Pete Hollings, Mike A. Hamilton, Geoff Heggie, Connor Caglioti, Khalid Yahia, Andrea Corredor Bravo

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyUltramafic rockGeochemistryPlatinum groupMaficRiftIntrusionGroup (periodic table)PetrologyThunderSeismologyPlatinumTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Thunder Bay North Intrusive Complex (TBNIC) of Canada comprises six variably Ni–Cu–platinum-group element (PGE)-mineralized mafic–ultramafic intrusions that intruded the Archean Quetico Subprovince. These are the Current, Escape, Lone Island, Greenwich, and 025 intrusions, with the former three aligned along an east–west-trending intrusion termed the East–West Corridor. These intrusions have a consistent igneous stratigraphy comprising, from bottom to top, peridotite, gabbros, and quartz gabbro. Only the Current and Escape intrusions are known to host sulfide mineralization in the peridotite. Despite the economic significance of the TBNIC, little work has been done to characterize its petrogenetic evolution and the causes of the apparent variable fertility. Our new ages for Escape (1107.6 ± 0.9 Ma) and Greenwich (1105.7 ± 0.9 Ma), combined with previously determined ages for Current (1106.6 ± 1.6 Ma) and Lone Island (1106.3 ± 2.1 Ma), demonstrate that the TBNIC was emplaced as part of the ca. 1.1 Ga Midcontinent Rift event. The similarities in their rare earth element geochemistry and consistently low Th/La–Sri values indicate that the intrusions crystallized from genetically related magmas that did not assimilate significant amounts of crustal material. Accordingly, their systematically negative εNdt values and Nb anomalies likely reflect that their parent magmas were largely sourced from the subdcontinental lithospheric mantle and not the Keweenaw Plume. Given their genetic relationship, the variable fertility of the intrusions cannot be related to processes that occurred in their mantle sources. Since the gabbros have systematically depleted Cu/Zr–Cu/Pd ratios and the peridotites have enriched ratios, the apparent variable fertility is likely related to the timing and location of sulfide segregation and accumulation, with the barren gabbros preserving magmas that lost sulfide liquid during transport to shallow crustal levels, and the mineralized peridotites recording accumulation of sulfide liquid. This interpretation has important implications for exploration as it implies that sulfide mineralization in the apparently barren intrusions may be located at depth in undiscovered ultramafic cumulates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society of America BulletinSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207