MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403916626 · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103240

Numerical and experimental investigation of Darrieus vertical axis wind turbines to enhance self-starting at low wind speeds

2024· article· en· W4403916626 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVertical axisHorizontal axisWind powerVertical axis wind turbineWind gradientThermal windWind profile power lawWind directionWind speedMeteorologyGeologyMarine engineeringEnvironmental sciencePhysicsEngineeringGeometryMathematicsElectrical engineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wind energy, being renewable, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly, has attracted global attention. However, due to suboptimal performance and limited research, vertical axis wind turbines (VAWTs) lag behind horizontal axis wind turbines (HAWTs) in commercial applications, particularly for large-scale installations. This study aims to improve the self-starting capability of the Darrieus VAWT. While some parameters, such as the number of blades (N) and solidity (σ), have been studied extensively, the airfoil shape has not received as much attention. This study compares the performance of National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) airfoils and Selig airfoils at a Reynolds number (Re) of 40,673. The investigation revealed that the NACA0015 airfoil exhibited the highest peak power coefficient ( C p ). Further analysis utilizing an advanced double multiple stream tube (DMST) code in MATLAB increased the peak C p by adjusting the thickness-to-camber ratio (t/c) of the NACA0015 airfoil, resulting in a 12.50 % increase in the maximum achievable C p at a Re of 40,673. This study compared four modes of VAWT operation, utilizing the NACA0015 airfoil and a modified NACA0015 airfoil for both straight-bladed and embossed-bladed VAWTs. The results showed that the modified NACA0015 airfoil for embossed-bladed VAWTs exhibited the best self-starting capability and rotation at wind velocities of 1 to 9 m s -1 . Additionally, the self-starting force required by embossed-bladed VAWTs was lower than that needed by straight-bladed VAWTs due to the ability of the embossed material to enhance airflow attachment to the VAWT and suppress turbulence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.702

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it