Data analysis and calibration of substation monitoring system based on Internet of Things (IoT)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The complex correlation of multi-source information of power equipment and the efficient validation of data information in the context of the Internet of Things (IoT) of electric power need to be studied urgently. The study applies density clustering to simplify the connection between multidimensional data and proposes a method for detecting anomalies in power equipment states based on interval set theory and density clustering. In addition, to ensure the accuracy of protection and measurement data for secondary equipment in substations, a dual verification system is established to sample secondary equipment data in the station area. The results of the related case study show that the anomaly detection method applying interval set clustering analysis can quickly and effectively detect the state anomalies of power equipment, which can be used as a decision-making basis for power grid troubleshooting. Based on the double calibration system of the guaranteed measurement data, it can realize the functions of power metering device error calibration, a secondary load test of the transformer, a voltage drop test of the secondary circuit of the voltage transformer, and so on.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it