MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403933698 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2024-0306

On the disruption of the horseshoe vortex in flow past bed-mounted cylinders

2024· article· en· W4403933698 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Tapas Kumar Pradhan, Abhinav Thakurta, Vesselina Roussinova, Ram Balachandar, Nihar Biswas

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVortexHorseshoe vortexHorseshoe (symbol)Flow (mathematics)Vortex sheddingGeologyMechanicsMarine engineeringGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringVorticityPhysicsTurbulenceReynolds numberComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study investigates the disruption of the horseshoe vortex (HSV) formed around a bed-mounted circular cylinder using helical strakes. Three cylinders were studied: one plain and two with helical strakes, oriented at 30° and 0° to the vertical mid-plane, respectively. A planar particle image velocimetry technique was employed for the measurement of the velocity field near the upstream cylinder-bed junction. The results revealed that strakes oriented at 0° prevent the formation of the HSV by disrupting the downward flow near the cylinder-bed junction. In contrast, a strong downflow was observed near the bed for the plain and 30° straked cylinder. The 0° helical strakes can be potentially used as scour-countermeasure around the pier due to their ability to disrupt the HSV. Analysis of turbulent stresses further demonstrated that the 0° straked cylinder experienced a reduction in Reynolds shear stress compared to both the plain and 30° straked cylinder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.951

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207