MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403938301 · doi:10.1109/tbcas.2024.3488713

A Highly-Scalable Poisson-Coded Retinal Optogenetic Stimulator With Fully-Analog ED-Based Adaptive Spike Detection and Closed-Loop Calibration

2024· article· en· W4403938301 on OpenAlexaff
Tayebeh Yousefi, Georg Zoidl, Hossein Kassiri

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptogeneticsSpike (software development)CalibrationClosed loopComputer scienceScalabilityPoisson distributionLoop (graph theory)Electronic engineeringNeurosciencePhysicsControl engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a fully implantable, inductively powered optogenetic stimulator that enhances stimulation efficacy and pathway specificity while maximizing energy efficiency and channel-count scalability. By leveraging opsins' photon integration properties with raster scanning and Poisson-coded stimulation, we achieve a uniform power profile and reduce wiring complexity, enabling a scalable system that supports more stimulation channels without compromising safety or functionality, improving prosthetic vision resolution. We also employed a compact and power-efficient (0.026 and 1.02 W overhead) SNR-boosted ADC-less spike detection circuit to adapt each LED's light intensity based on real-time feedback from RGC spiking cells. This closed-loop adaptivity adjusts stimulation to opsin distribution variations, over time and across different patients, ensuring effective and consistent stimulation across patients, enhancing both energy efficiency and visual perception quality. The 3 3 IC, fabricated in 180nm CMOS, is coupled with a 100-channel custom optrode array fabricated using an InGaN process on a sapphire substrate. Experimental results demonstrate circuit-level performance, system-level efficacy, and in-vitro validation. Comparison tables highlight our work's advantages over state-of-the-art implantable spike detection systems and retinal prostheses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and SystemsSame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207