Effect of various perioperative semaglutide interruption intervals on residual gastric content assessed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A retrospective single center observational study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that perioperative semaglutide use is associated with increased residual gastric content (RGC) and risk of bronchoaspiration under anesthesia. We compared the occurrence of increased RGC in semaglutide users and non-users undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy to define the time interval at which RGC becomes comparable between groups. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective electronic chart review at a tertiary hospital. Patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy under deep sedation/general anesthesia between July/2021-July/2023 were included and divided into two (SG = semaglutide, NSG = non-semaglutide) groups, according to whether they had received semaglutide within 30 days prior to the esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to explore which factors were associated with increased RGC, defined as any amount of solid content, or > 0.8 mL/Kg (measured from the aspiration/suction canister) of fluid content. RESULTS: Among the 1094 (SG = 123; NSG = 971) patients included, increased RGC was observed in 56 (5.12%), being 25 (20.33%) in the SG and 31 (3.19%) in the NSG (p < 0.001). Following weighted analysis, the presence of ongoing digestive symptoms (nausea/vomiting, dyspepsia, and/or bloating/abdominal distension) pre-esophagogastroduodenoscopy [OR = 15.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.85-23.45)] and the time intervals of preoperative semaglutide interruption < 8 days [OR 10.0 (95%CI 6.67-15.65)] and 8-14 days [4.59 (95%CI 2.91-7.37)] remained significantly associated with increased RGC. Following inverse probability treatment weighting adjustment including a composite variable 'time intervals of semaglutide interruption' versus 'presence of ongoing digestive symptoms', only time intervals > 14 days and without digestive symptoms showed no association with increased RGC [OR = 0.77 (95%CI 0.22-2.01)]. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative semaglutide use is associated with increased RGC in patients undergoing elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Preoperative discontinuation of > 21 days and > 14 days in patients with and without ongoing digestive symptoms, respectively, resulted in RGC similar to non-semaglutide users.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".