MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403942789 · doi:10.3390/rs16214065

A Heatmap-Supplemented R-CNN Trained Using an Inflated IoU for Small Object Detection

2024· article· en· W4403942789 on OpenAlexaff
Justin Butler, Henry Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceObject detectionBackbone networkConvolutional neural networkComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Object detection architectures struggle to detect small objects across applications including remote sensing and autonomous vehicles. Specifically, for unmanned aerial vehicles, poor detection of small objects directly limits this technology’s applicability. Objects both appear smaller than they are in large-scale images captured in aerial imagery and are represented by reduced information in high-altitude imagery. This paper presents a new architecture, CR-CNN, which predicts independent regions of interest from two unique prediction branches within the first stage of the network: a conventional R-CNN convolutional backbone and an hourglass backbone. Utilizing two independent sources within the first stage, our approach leads to an increase in successful predictions of regions that contain smaller objects. Anchor-based methods such as R-CNNs also utilize less than half the number of small objects compared to larger ones during training due to the poor intersection over union (IoU) scores between the generated anchors and the groundtruth—further reducing their performance on small objects. Therefore, we also propose artificially inflating the IoU of smaller objects during training using a simple, size-based Gaussian multiplier—leading to an increase in the quantity of small objects seen per training cycle based on an increase in the number of anchor–object pairs during training. This architecture and training strategy led to improved detection overall on two challenging aerial-based datasets heavily composed of small objects while predicting fewer false positives compared to Mask R-CNN. These results suggest that while new and unique architectures will continue to play a part in advancing the field of object detection, the training methodologies and strategies used will also play a valuable role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score0.738

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207