MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403955438 · doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101132

Walking biomechanics in women with patellofemoral osteoarthritis differ compared to men with and women without patellofemoral osteoarthritis

2024· article· en· W4403955438 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew King, David C. Ackland, Harvi F. Hart, Anthony G. Schache, Prasanna Sritharan, Marcus G. Pandy, Kay M. Crossley

Bibliographic record

VenueBrazilian Journal of Physical Therapy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilAustralian Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMedical Research CouncilWestern University
KeywordsOsteoarthritisBiomechanicsMedicinePatellofemoral jointPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPatellaOrthodonticsAlternative medicineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Biomechanical impairments in patellofeomoral osteoarthritis are sex specific. • Joint moment impulses of anti gravity muscles are lower in women with PF OA. • Recommendations from male-dominated cohorts may not apply to women with PF OA. • Sex as an effect modifier should be considered in future research. Differences in walking biomechanics between women and men with patellofemoral joint (PF) osteoarthritis (OA) may contribute to the development or progression of persistent symptoms in people with PFJ OA. Evaluate how walking biomechanics of women with PF OA differ from: (i) men with PFJ OA; and (ii) women without PF OA. Second, explore the relationship between knee-related symptoms/function and walking biomechanics in individuals with PF OA, and whether these are modified by sex. Sixty-seven individuals with PF OA (43 women) and 14 women without PF OA were included. Biomechanics data were recorded during walking. Patient-reported symptoms and function were obtained using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Differences in continuous biomechanical data were assessed using statistical parametric mapping, with discrete data and relationships evaluated using linear models. Women with PF OA walked with a greater hip adduction angle throughout stance ( t > 2.757) and lower impulses for the hip flexion, knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion moments (adjusted mean differences [95 % CI]:3.3 × 10 –2 [-4.9 × 10 –2 , -1.6 × 10 –2 ], -2.9 × 10 –2 [-5.3 × 10 –2 , -0.4 × 10 –2 ], -5.1 × 10 –2 [-8.2 × 10 –2 , -2.0 × 10 –2 ] Nms/kg, respectively) compared to men with PF OA. Compared to their asymptomatic peers, women with PF OA displayed a 5° offset towards greater hip flexion. Higher knee adduction moment impulse correlated with worse KOOS-ADL scores in men, not women. Observed biomechanical differences were small in nature with moderate to weak relationship observed with the KOOS. Findings were not limited to the knee, indicating that women with PF OA display unique biomechanical features across the kinetic-chain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrazilian Journal of Physical TherapySame topicLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesFrench-language works237,207