MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403957050 · doi:10.4103/ijru.ijru_8_24

Ambulatory buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in geriatric population: A practice change experience

2024· article· en· W4403957050 on OpenAlexaff
Vahid Mehrnoush, Waleed Shabana, Ahmed Kotb, Ahmed S. Zakaria, Hazem Elmansy, Owen Prowse, Abdulrahman Alkandari, Walid Shahrour

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational journal of reconstructive urology. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsNOSM UniversityThunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrethroplastyBuccal administrationAmbulatoryMedicinePopulationDentistrySurgeryUrethraEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Context: Due to the overwhelming burden of coronavirus disease 2019, buccal mucosal graft (BMG) urethroplasty in the elderly has been shifted from inpatient to ambulatory at our center in early 2020. Aim: This study aims to describe our experience with ambulatory BMG urethroplasty in the elderly and compare its feasibility and safety to inpatient urethroplasty before and after the practice change. Setting and Design: A pre and postpractice change retrospective cohort study of patients aged 65 years or above with BMG urethroplasty performed at our center between March 2018 and May 2022. Materials and Methods: Demographics, clinical characteristics, postoperative course, and complications were compared in ambulatory (discharged within 6 h) versus inpatient BMG urethroplasty groups. Statistical Analysis: A pre-and post-practice change retrospective cohort study of patients aged 65 or older with BMG urethroplasty performed at our centre between March 2018 and May 2022. Results: Of 37 BMG urethroplasties, 15 (40.5%) were inpatient, whereas 22 (59.5%) were ambulatory. Immediate complication rate was comparable in inpatient (2/15, 13.3%) and ambulatory cases (1/22, 4.5%): one wound infection in both groups and one recurrent urinary tract infection in the inpatient group. No oral cavity complications, bleeding/hematoma, or anesthesia-related morbidity were observed. There was no statistically significant difference in recurrence (13.3% vs. 9.6%; P = 0.98) and success rates (90.9% vs. 86.7%; P = 0.53) over a median of 53 (inpatient) and 34 (ambulatory) months follow-up. Conclusions: Ambulatory BMG urethroplasty, discharge within 6 hours of surgery, appears safe and feasible in geriatric populations (>65), with no increased adverse outcomes. Factors like healthcare access, caregiver availability, and patient education play roles in discharge time. However, more robust studies are warranted for conclusive evidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational journal of reconstructive urology.Same topicUrological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207