Investigating the Factors Affecting Sexual Myths in Women and Men Based on the Biopsychosocial Model: A Scoping Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Sexual myths are mainly devoid of any substantial evidence and are passed on by word of mouth. Myths about sexuality may thus diminish the quality of sexual activities, cause sexual dysfunctions, including erectile dysfunction (impotence), vaginismus, difficulty reaching an orgasm, and premature ejaculation, and make individuals feel dread, anxiety, and failure or inadequacy, which can have adverse effects on their sexual identity. Objective: This study investigated the factors affecting sexual myths in women and men based on the biopsychosocial model. Methods: In this scoping review, the research databases of PubMed, Google Scholar, Magiran, PsycINFO, IranDoc, Ovid, ProQuest, Scientific Information Database (SID), and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. For this purpose, a systematic search was conducted to retrieve the relevant articles from November 3 to 21, 2023, using the keywords of “sexual myth, sexual beliefs, wrong beliefs, dysfunctional sexual beliefs, sexuality, opinions, and associated factors.” The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) further evaluated the quality of the included studies. The data were then extracted from all the articles that met the eligibility criteria based on the study objectives. Results: In total, 12 articles were reviewed, whose data were grouped into three general categories, viz., (i) biological factors (i.e., age and gender), (ii) psychological factors (that is, sexual dysfunction, political opinions, opinions on virginity), and (iii) social factors (namely, educational attainment, occupation, place of residence, marital status, type of marriage, age at marriage, premarital sexual experience, parents’ educational attainment, spouse’s educational attainment, number of children, parent’s employment status, spouse’s occupation, primary source of information about sex and feelings about sexual conversations, information about sexual life, academic department, sexual health assessment, and religious beliefs). Conclusion: Biopsychosocial factors could significantly affect sexual myths; therefore, considering their mediating role in providing sex education to women and men is crucial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.047 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.023 | 0.018 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".