Nonlinear incompressible shear wave models in hyperelasticity and viscoelasticity frameworks, with applications to Love waves
Bibliographic record
Abstract
General equations describing shear displacements in incompressible hyperelastic materials, holding for an arbitrary form of strain energy density function, are presented and applied to the description of nonlinear Love-type waves propagating on an interface between materials with different mechanical properties. The model is valid for a broad class of hyper-viscoelastic materials. For the Murnaghan constitutive model, shear wave equations contain cubic and quintic differential polynomial terms, including viscoelasticity contributions in terms of dispersion terms that include mixed derivatives u x x t of the material displacement. Full (2+1)-dimensional numerical simulations of waves propagating in the bulk of a two-layered solid are undertaken and analyzed with respect to the source position and mechanical properties of the layers. Interfacial nonlinear Love waves and free upper surface shear waves are tracked; it is demonstrated that in the fully nonlinear case, the variable wave speed of interface and surface waves generally satisfies the linear Love wave existence condition c 1 < v < c 2 , while tending to the larger material wave speed c 1 or c 2 for large times. • New wave equations for Love-type shear wave propagation are derived in hyperelasticity and hyper-viscoelasticity frameworks. • The model is valid for a broad class of materials. • For the Murnaghan constitutive relation relevant to geophysical modeling, shear wave equations contain cubic and quintic differential polynomial terms, including viscoelasticity contributions in terms of dispersion terms that include mixed derivatives u x x t of the material displacement. • Full (2+1)-dimensional numerical simulations of waves propagating in the bulk of a two-layered solid are undertaken and analyzed. • It is shown that in the fully nonlinear case, the variable wave speed of interface and surface waves generally satisfies the linear Love wave existence condition c 1 < v < c 2 . • While it is known that nonlinear purely elastic waves of this type may exhibit wave breaking [reference 8], viscoelastic effects eliminate the wave breaking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".