A qualitative account of mothers of pediatric heart transplant recipients’ experience at a pilot mindfulness-based retreat: insights for implementation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore participants' shared experience attending a pilot mindfulness-based retreat (MBR) intervention supporting the psychological well-being of mothers of pediatric heart transplant (HTx) recipients. METHODS: A qualitative description approach was used within a larger hybrid mixed-methods pilot study evaluating the implementation-effectiveness of a 2-day MBR tailored specifically for a pediatric HTx population. A purposive sample of mothers was recruited from a leading Canadian pediatric HTx center, and each represented a primary, female-identifying caregiver, sharing residence with a pediatric HTx recipient of at least 4 months post-transplant. Two focus groups were conducted after and 16 individual interviews 3 months after the MBR to elicit participants' in-depth experience attending the MBR. Reflexive thematic data analysis led to theme development through an iterative process with consensus among team members. RESULTS: Sixteen mothers of pediatric HTx recipients (mean patient age 9.8 years; mean time post-transplant 8.2 years) participated in the MBR held in Ontario, Canada. Qualitative findings illuminated mothers' shared experience attending the MBR, reflecting three themes that describe key intervention elements beyond those affiliated with mindfulness practice alone: "respite," "readiness," and "relationships." Findings highlight acceptability and appropriateness as distinct yet interrelated implementation outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Elements of "respite," "readiness," and "relationships" are key components of the MBR experience that offer valuable intervention and clinical considerations related to mothers' psychological well-being. Aligning intervention acceptability and appropriateness through tailored strategies may aid implementation. Future research considering maternal readiness relative to support intervention participation is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".