MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403980103 · doi:10.3390/jfb15110326

The Impact of Helium and Nitrogen Plasmas on Electrospun Gelatin Nanofiber Scaffolds for Skin Tissue Engineering Applications

2024· article· en· W4403980103 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Functional Biomaterials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceGelatinNanofiberTissue engineeringHeliumNanotechnologyPlasmaNitrogenElectrospinningComposite materialBiomedical engineeringPolymerOrganic chemistryEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explores the fabrication of tannic acid-crosslinked gelatin nanofibers via electrospinning, followed by helium and nitrogen plasma treatment to enhance their biofunctionality, which was assessed using fibroblast cells. The nanofibers were characterized using scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and water contact angle measurements before and after treatment. Helium and nitrogen gas plasma were employed to modify the nanofiber surfaces. Results indicated that helium and nitrogen plasma treatment significantly increased the hydrophilicity and biofunctionality of the nanofibers by 5.1° ± 0.6 and 15.6° ± 2.2, respectively, making them more suitable for human skin fibroblast applications. To investigate the impact of plasma treatment on gelatin, we employed a computational model using density functional theory with the B3LYP/6-31+G(d) method. This model represented gelatin as an amino acid chain composed of glycine, hydroxyproline, and proline, interacting with plasma particles. Vibrational analysis of these systems was used to interpret the vibrational spectra of untreated and plasma-treated gelatin. To further correlate with experimental findings, molecular dynamics simulations were performed on a system of three interacting gelatin chains. These simulations explored changes in amino acid bonding. The computational results align with experimental observations. Comprehensive analyses confirmed that these treatments improved hydrophilicity and biofunctionality, supporting the use of plasma-treated gelatin nanofibers in skin tissue engineering applications. Gelatin's natural biopolymer properties and the versatility of plasma surface modification techniques underscore its potential in regenerating cartilage, skin, circulatory tissues, and hamstrings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it