Éditorial : Comment favoriser l’intérêt pour les parcours en recherche?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Une majorité d’étudiants au baccalauréat en psychologie s’inscrivent dans ce programme dans l’espoir de devenir psychologues. Or, le baccalauréat en psychologie de l’Université Laval vise autant à former les étudiants pour « [...] la poursuite d’études de cycles supérieurs en psychologie en vue de mener une carrière en recherche [... qu’]en intervention comme psychologue » (Université Laval, s. d.). Malgré cela, il est de notre avis que la formation au baccalauréat ne met pas suffisamment en valeur les aspects positifs de la recherche en psychologie et pourrait favoriser davantage l’intérêt des étudiants pour un parcours dans ce domaine. Cet éditorial vise à faire avancer la réflexion sur la place souvent peu favorable qu’occupe la recherche dans les programmes de premier cycle en psychologie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.024 | 0.138 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.035 | 0.034 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".