MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparative assessment of early-ripening soybean cultivars and samples in the conditions of the northern Volga region

2024· article· en· W4403982296 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
I. Ivanova, A Fadeev, S Ilina

Bibliographic record

VenueAgricultural science Euro-North-East · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
KeywordsRipeningVolga regionCultivarGeographyBiologyHorticultureHistoryAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of the research was to study promising soybean cultivars from the collection of the N. I. Vavilov All–Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR) of various ecological and geographical groups in the conditions of the Chuvash Republic (northern Volga Region of the Volga Federal District of the Russian Federation) and identify sources of breeding valuable traits for their further use in hybridization. Under observation, study and comparison were 161 samples of the VIR collection and 40 cultivars of Russian and foreign breeding (Belarus, Canada, USA, Germany, Poland, Ukraine, Austria, Sweden, etc.). The ‘SibNIIK-315’ cultivar approved for cultivation in the Volga-Vyatka region (Russia) was taken as the standard. The research was carried out in 2021–2023 in the field on a natural background (gray forest heavy loamy soil). According to the productivity of one plant in the very early ripening group the ‘Memory Fadeeva’ and ‘Kasatka’ (Russia) cultivars had the best indicators of 17.0 g, in the early ripening group it was ‘Doka’ (Russia) with 18.0 g and sample 1029/2 (Poland) with 18.5 g. The productivity of the standard cultivar was 14.1 g/plant, LSD 05 = 2.6 g. According to the seed size the following promising cultivars were identified: ‘Lumaria’ and ‘Belgorodskaya 7’ (Russia), which had maximum weight of 1000 seeds of 206g and 186 g, respectively, that was 41g and 21 g more than the standard cultivar, LSD 05 = 12.6 g. As to the height of attachment of the lower bean, 8 samples and three cultivars were positively characterized. They had the placement of the upper layer of beans to the soil surface more than 17 cm, that was 6 cm higher than this indicator for the standard cultivar, with LSD 05 = 5.4 cm. All the studied source material was highly resistant to phytopathogens and lodging. The cultivars identified during the research process are valuable source material for the development of new highly competitive soybean varieties of the northern ecotype for cultivation in conditions of 56 o north latitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgricultural science Euro-North-EastSame topicAgricultural Productivity and Crop ImprovementFrench-language works237,207